I regret both the money and the time I spent on it.
I subscribed to MultipleChat expecting a serious multi-AI workspace for professional use. What I got was deeply disappointing.
The platform claims “multi-model collaboration” (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc.), but in practice there is no real collaboration at all. Regardless of how many models you select, the answers are clearly generated by a single underlying system, with no difference in reasoning style, depth, or perspective. This feels more like a marketing claim than an actual feature.
The output quality is consistently low-value, generic, and shallow, especially compared to using ChatGPT or Claude directly. For strategic, professional, or high-level work, the responses are almost unusable.
The so-called “online research” feature does not work. The system openly admits it cannot browse or retrieve live information, even when the option is selected. No sources, no real data, no differentiation — nothing.
On top of that, the UI has serious limitations:
chats cannot be renamed
chats open at the bottom instead of the beginning
there is no real project navigation
This makes it unsuitable for any serious, long-term work.
I tested the tool extensively, with different prompts and model selections. The results were consistently poor. This is not a cheaper alternative to ChatGPT — it is a downgrade.
Unfortunately, this product feels misleadingly advertised. I regret both the money and the time I spent on it.
29 janvier 2026
Avis spontané