Hi Daniel,
We’re very concerned to read your review and feel it’s important to respond publicly to clarify a number of statements made.
We strongly reject the suggestion that our R&D team is inexperienced or untrained.
Our formulation process follows structured development protocols, ingredient safety assessments, and regulatory considerations. During product development, ingredient discussions can involve feasibility, compliance, stability, and cost factors — differences in technical opinion should not be interpreted as a lack of competence.
Regarding communication, there was a staff transition during that period which may have contributed to delays in response. While that is not an excuse, it is context — and it was certainly never our intention to ignore correspondence. We acknowledge that the experience may not have met expectations and regret any frustration caused.
In terms of pricing, our manufacturing efficiencies, supplier partnerships, and production scale allow us to remain competitive. Lower pricing does not equate to lower standards. We maintain quality control procedures and comply with relevant Australian regulations and manufacturing requirements.
We also categorically deny the claim that there are “active ACCC proceedings” against the business. This statement is incorrect. We operate in accordance with Australian Consumer Law and take compliance obligations very seriously.
We stand by the integrity of our company and the quality of our work. If there are specific outstanding matters you would like to resolve, we remain open to discussing them directly and professionally.
We believe transparency is important, which is why we are responding here publicly.