SteadyOptions Avis 

Attitude(bad) and ego - to sum things up. I don’t care what the performance of the service is. If asking questions and giving feedback are met with snark and attitude - lack of professionalism - then it is not worth using the service. Sorry if I expect adult and professional behavior from a site that I pay for.

I have invested Rs.30000 in this app on September 22nd 2021. After that it app was opened only 9 days. Whenever I have tried to login it shows 'network exception error'. Totally it's fraud application. Don't invest

SteadyOptions seems to be a legit investing service.

I do have a bunch of caveats but I will still give them a 5 star because they are honest about what they can do and transparent with their community (this is a hell of a lot more that can be said about most investing services). They have an incredibly active community of subscribers and if they lied or steered customers wrong, the community would be able to lash back.

They have multiple services. I tried their premier service briefly but quickly decided it was not for me. It's a strategy focused on earnings reports that offers the hope of 100% returns (seemingly genuinely calculated, not the phony-baloney returns calculated by so many services). But the list of caveats is huge. They recommend that your account be no larger than $100K. This is clearly because so many people are trying to crowd into the same trade at the same time precisely because they are so successful that you even have to buy another service to know whether you should enter in or not at the going rate and then spend a huge amount of time trying to get your order filled at precisely the right price to make it worthwhile, etc. It's a big hassle. If you don't have anything else to do and can respond with lightning speed to all trade alerts, this might be a decent way of turning a $50K account into $100K the next year. But for me, this is unworkable. And for anyone hoping to turn $500K into $1 million the next year, forget about it. You probably won't get enough options contracts to make it worthwhile.

They have other innovative investment methods, however. The one I opted for is called Anchor Trades. It's an approach that uses options to essentially track a specific index like SPY or QQQ. But the strategy basically tries to goose returns by adding leverage possible from using options but then also adding a hedge against major downside. The strategy further tries to pay for this hedge using a calendar spread (buying a far-off option but then selling a more near-term option at the same strike). The latter is intended to capture theta value (time value decay) in calendar options to pay for the hedge that so that mostly what you are left with (if all balances out) is a leveraged position in the underlying index while also providing the downside protection. It's a brilliant overall approach but I have not seen it through all cycles so I can't vouch for it long-term, although the general math seems to work well. The general strategy seems to cap downside at roughly 9% in crashes (and even making money in big crashes) but giving major upside potential with options leverage.

This approach does not do well in flat and slightly declining markets. So expect to lose money there.

Their other investment methods are more conservative and I have not tried them out. But these guys are generally the real deal. They know their options well and are quite transparent. You might see some negative reviews of the premier service they offer because of disbelief of the crazy returns but most of these reviews are without any actual experience. After a lot of research, I determined that they are both believable returns but not necessarily ones that an average investor can get due do to all the difficulties placing trades to match what they did. The company has seemingly done nothing to hide this. It is what it is.

So if you stick with one of the more conservative strategies, I think you will likely get what they advertise. With the most aggressive strategy, maybe you will succeed but caveat emptor.