Strongrootswebdesign Avis 1

TrustScore 3 sur 5

3,2

Bien que nous ne vérifiions pas les affirmations individuelles, car les avis reflètent l’opinion personnelle des utilisateurs, certains avis sont accompagnés du statut « vérifié » lorsqu’il est possible de confirmer qu’une interaction avec l’entreprise a eu lieu. En savoir plus

Pour protéger l’intégrité de la plateforme, chaque avis, qu’il soit vérifié ou non, est analysé par notre logiciel automatisé 24 h/24 et 7 j/7. Il identifie et retire tout contenu qui enfreint nos conditions d'utilisation, y compris les avis qui ne se basent pas sur des expériences authentiques. Nous sommes conscients que nous ne pouvons pas tout détecter, et vous pouvez nous signaler tout élément qui aurait pu nous échapper. En savoir plus


Coordonnées de contact

3,2

Moyen

TrustScore 3 sur 5

1 avis

5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile

Comment cette entreprise utilise Trustpilot

Découvrez comment les avis de l’entreprise sont collectés, notés et modérés.

Les entreprises sur Trustpilot n’ont pas le droit d’offrir des incitatifs ni de payer pour masquer des avis. Les avis reflètent l’opinion des utilisateurs et non celle de Trustpilot. En savoir plus

Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

I recently terminated services with Strong Roots Web Design

I recently terminated services with Sarah Gershone due to her lack of preparedness and professionalism in actually completing the project. Specifically, we had our first official meeting to start the project, what she limits to one hour. As per our agreement I had sent her all content five days earlier including the proposed website outline, and suggested content for all areas. She acknowledged receiving the information and replied "looks good." At the time of the meeting, it was immediately evident she had not reviewed any of the content. For example, the first document she brought up was a list of assessment tools I use which simply an insert. She described this as the "home page". When I told her this was simply an insert, she could not find the home page, so I had to take over the screen sharing and show her the home page document. She then had no specific comment on any of the documentation I previously sent her. Later in the session she made a general comment that the documentation I had produced was not good, implying it could not be used on the website. For reference, I identified content for every area of my practice (such as anxiety, depression) did searches on typical statements therapist make, created my own version and then ran it through AI several times. I provided her multiple examples in each area. Sarah then proceeded to ask me vague (she describes them as "open-ended") questions, such as the type of client's that come to my practice. When I asked specifics such as mostly males, better educated etc, she wasn't satisfied with my response. The session was ended earlier because it was clear to both of us it was a very unproductive meeting. Within one hour (11 am) I sent her an email specifying three concerns: 1) if she didn't like my content she had five days to review it, she could have told me prior to the meeting and/or rescheduled; 2) if she wants to ask open-ended questions which is how she wants to form the website, she should have let me know the questions ahead of time (per her agreement there is only one hour for the meeting) and 3) it was very unlikely she had not properly prepared for the meeting. I finished the email that I was still willing to work with her, but I needed a very different effort from her. After 24 hours she had not replied so I ended services with her. When she did reply her choice was to say I was defensive during the meeting and not acknowledging the obvious she had not done her job. I requested full reimbursement due to her lack of services and told her I would not pursue matters further. Instead she "itemized" out $1700 worth of services she said she already done, which is remarkable since we had only 30 minutes of the first working session, for which she was not prepared. Sarah notes on her website she is a "busy mom of four [children]". So I understand if someone does not always follow through. What concerns me is her lack of accountability and feeling she is entitled to $1700 with no meaningful work produced. I am sure she will respond to this review with she did what was on the contract. However, much of this is only verifiable by her and she does not acknowledge the obvious (as recorded on her session) she was not prepared to do the work. I gave her multiple opportunities to either change her business approach or refund the money. She did neither. I suggest you think seriously about this before signing any contract with her.

15 janvier 2026
Avis spontané

Cette entreprise vous appartient ?

Revendiquez votre profil pour accéder aux outils gratuits de Trustpilot et renforcer vos relations clients.

Créez un compte gratuit

L’expérience Trustpilot

Tout le monde peut écrire un avis Trustpilot. Les auteurs d'avis peuvent les modifier ou les supprimer à tout moment et les avis sont affichés tant que les comptes utilisateurs respectifs sont actifs.

Les entreprises peuvent utiliser nos invitations automatiques pour collecter des avis. Ils sont accompagnés du statut « Vérifié » pour indiquer qu'il s'agit d'expériences authentiques.

En savoir plus sur les différents types d'avis.

Nous avons des personnes dédiées et des technologies intelligentes pour nous aider à protéger notre plateforme. Découvrez comment nous combattons les faux avis.

En savoir plus sur le parcours des avis sur Trustpilot.

Voici 8 conseils pour écrire des avis de qualité.

La vérification permet de s'assurer que des personnes réelles écrivent les avis que vous lisez sur Trustpilot.

Offrir des incitatifs en échange d'avis ou demander des avis de manière sélective peut fausser le TrustScore, ce qui va à l'encontre de nos conditions d'utilisation.

En savoir plus