Bien que nous ne vérifiions pas les affirmations individuelles, car les avis reflètent l’opinion personnelle des utilisateurs, certains avis sont accompagnés du statut « vérifié » lorsqu’il est possible de confirmer qu’une interaction avec l’entreprise a eu lieu. En savoir plus

Pour protéger l’intégrité de la plateforme, chaque avis, qu’il soit vérifié ou non, est analysé par notre logiciel automatisé 24 h/24 et 7 j/7. Il identifie et retire tout contenu qui enfreint nos conditions d'utilisation, y compris les avis qui ne se basent pas sur des expériences authentiques. Nous sommes conscients que nous ne pouvons pas tout détecter, et vous pouvez nous signaler tout élément qui aurait pu nous échapper. En savoir plus

Lisez les avis des autres

Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

The Guardian has a clear agenda now, it is free for the time being only because it lures readers to create a 'public opinion' but increasingly pushing for subscription , it is in short a propaganda... Voir plus

Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

I wanted to support independent journalism and so subscribed for a good year. I’ve since decided to cancel and, apparently, need to contact them via phone to do so. They provide only a UK number... Voir plus

Noté 3 sur 5 étoiles

I really enjoy the journalism, but they've just emailed me to announce a second price increase for the All Access Digital subscription - so it's gone up 40% in less than 18 months. Feels like taking r... Voir plus

Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Don't subscribe via iTunes. If you do you can only access it on IOS devices, as I subsequently found out. This should be explained to customers - is it even legal?? Customer service totally unwilling... Voir plus

À propos de l'entreprise


Coordonnées de contact

1,5

Mauvais

TrustScore 1.5 sur 5

605 avis

5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile

Aucune trace de demande d’avis

Cette entreprise n’a pas invité ses clients à l'évaluer, donc les avis ne sont peut-être pas représentatifs.

Comment cette entreprise utilise Trustpilot

Découvrez comment les avis de l’entreprise sont collectés, notés et modérés.

1,5

Tous les avis

(605)

38 avis reçus au cours des 12 derniers mois

Écrire un avis
Les entreprises sur Trustpilot n’ont pas le droit d’offrir des incitatifs ni de payer pour masquer des avis. Les avis reflètent l’opinion des utilisateurs et non celle de Trustpilot. En savoir plus

Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Included a major direct misquote in an…

Included a major direct misquote in an article. I would not have known if I didn’t watch the interview myself. This is not a reliable source of information and sadly makes me question previous content I have read in the past from this source. More effort should be made on persevering the accuracy of published information.

9 août 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Look how low the gutter Guardian has…

Look how low the gutter Guardian has now stooped. Making up allegations of bullying against Badenoch. What a disgrace to our country. I would not use the Guardian to pick up my dog’s faeces. Shame on you.

30 juillet 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Bias reporting

Bias reporting, articles tend to have running themes and agendas around what they report and how it’s reported, very disappointing

25 juillet 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Once upon a time the Guardian was a…

Once upon a time the Guardian was a great paper. Had it shipped, on thin smooth paper all the way to Australia. But now, it's mainstream news, not to be trusted in its wordings (always to make Russia look bad and offensive) and so obviously beholden to the US security state with no accountability to anyone, a mockery of democracy, in the service of one who believes they have the right to commandeer everyone else (NATO) as they wish. But isn't that construct crumbling, severely crumbling, yet escapes journalistic scrutiny? Little one hears about BRICS, little on China, other than that they are reportedly guilty of "over-capacity" in EVs. Why not report under-capacity on the part of the US. Why not report lack of competitiveness?
What The Guardian now delights in is what borders on pornography, obsession with sex and this kind of low-level sundry stuff. Truly pathetic.

14 juillet 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 2 sur 5 étoiles

A curate's egg. Some good, some bad.

I've been reading the Graun for 30+ years. It used to be the main centre-left UK newspaper, and something of a voice of reason among the rabid tabloid press, but in recent years has followed an eccentric orbit that has taken it into the realm of sub student union politics.

Sure there are some excellent journalists still remaining- Marina Hyde and John Crace spring immediately to mind- but there are far more purveyors of asinine dross- like Owen Jones and Arwa Mahdawi, tedious wordsmiths who wouldn't have been given column space in the past.

I can only assume that the Graun is feeling the pinch- like most traditional media- and that these hacks must work for next to nothing. They're certainly not there because of their ability.

The news and sports coverage is still pretty good, but the opinion pieces are frankly laughable.

I remain politically on the left, but not in a space I share with the Graun any more.

7 juillet 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Worst newspaper in existence

Worst newspaper in existence. They lie about the vast majority of issues and only provide one biased point of view (which can only be described as propaganda). Sad to see in this day and age.

1 juillet 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Posh Tory Rory

Posh Tory Rory is exactly what it says on the tin. If he had a tin. His nearly 10 years as a Tory politician was more than enough to enable this execrable farce of a government to bring about the destruction of our country and society.
Spare us your crocodile tears Rory. The Tory party has just completed its mission to destroy us the ordinary people and it was misguided people like you who set it up. Once a Tory always a Tory, Rory.

23 juin 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Tim Byrne needs to be called out

I recently read Tim Byrne's review of Sunset Boulevard in the Australian edition of The Guardian. And I was absolutely appalled by the way he wrote about Sarah Brightman's performance as Norma Desmond. He writes, "she seems to suck in lungfuls of air like a guppy, only to release a breathy, stretched and haltingly phrased series of notes that barely travel over the orchestra pit". This description is needlessly harsh and really insensitive considering that Sarah is battling Motor Neuron Disease. This performance of Sunset Boulevard is actually Sarah Brightman's first time singing in 30 years. And given that she was diagnosed with MND early last year, there's a possibility that this return to the stage was meant to be a farewell before her condition took away her ability to walk and talk. Tim Byrne has always been a malicious troll, but having a go at someone battling a serious disability is going too far. Someone at The Guardian needs to tell Tim to stop being a jerk and start treating artists with respect.

29 mai 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 2 sur 5 étoiles

It is so frustrating

It is so frustrating. The Guardian has the occasional article which hits the nail right on the head, perceptive, ethical, moral and cultural. At other times it will argue about the colour of a Conservative MP's tie just for the sake of getting a swing at the Tory Party. Its reputation would rise in leaps and bounds if it could only be more balanced, but until then, the Guardian will continue to be derided as 'Left-Wing rubbish' .

7 juin 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Misleading article in The Guardian relating…

Read article in The Guardian relating to an immigrant cyclist not wanting to go to the Bobby Stockholm. They have written a misleading article and have had it promoted in the BBC news which cannot be discussed on The Guardians website.

The article relates to an immigrant who has no income, has won some cycle races in the past, but is not a professional cyclist (as the BBC reporting subsequently said) and has no means to support themselves. This case is one of someone who has chosen to leave their own country and seek asylum for no specified reason other than they didn’t like it. The article claims that the generosity of the UK to house them at tax payers expense is not adequate and that they deserve more.

There is no rational argument for them to have special treatment, they have chosen the path that they are on and if they were able to earn a living as a professional then they would not be in this situation. The Guardian and the BBC are misrepresenting our duties and the rights of a refugee to preferential treatment which is effectively positioned as a political discussion. This is neither accurate in fact, nor is it morally right, the person is in a situation that is not pleasant and I am sure they would not choose it if they had a good life, but that does not qualify them for special treatment that is not available to others.

14 mai 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Guardian is misleading public about atrocious Israeli crimes in genocide against Gaza and West bank

Guardian is continuously failing to report on continuing Israeli genocide in Gaza and West bank. There are mass graves with hundreds of civilians found in hospitals in Gaza and other atrocities like 2 children being burned alive only yesterday in West bank by Israeli settlers. Guardian describes genocide in Rafah and bombing civilian who were 5 times displaced in tents as "Israel fighting Hamas in Jabalia camp" once again. Even the reality is that toddlers are being blown up to pieces and newborn children are being shot in the head which I have seen with my own eyes in video footage as soon as I woke up. Guardian is also failing to report about torture camps in Israel with grown men being ziptied to beds, amputated limbs and kept in nappies, electrocuted and tortured on daily basis until their death. One of them was a surgeon from Gaza as well. All of this is documented and has wide available proof on other media outlets, even Western ones.

13 mai 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

I read The Guardian everyday

I read The Guardian everyday. Based in the UK but covers stories in North American you won't see elsewhere. Spends money on real journalism rather than just pulling news off the wires or spreading celebrity gossip.

8 mai 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

BEWARE no news access w Support subscription !

BEWARE! I paid for the Support subscription and discovered it doesn’t allow me access the newspaper more than the standard otherwise free 30 stories per month. This information is not disclosed anywhere prior to payment and payment is non refundable.
What a cheap, sleazy trick…

1 mai 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Subscribed via a promotion through…Apple

Subscribed via a promotion through Apple but I found that I could not access the news via my iPhone or iPad as the Guardian app would not recognise my email address. When The Guardian "help" was alerted they indicated that it was all to do with "Apple" and not their problem. Been trying to fix this issue for 4 months now. Having the problem sorted out with two conglomerates in the picture is impossible! Be aware and stay away from 3rd party subscriptions!

3 mai 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

I used to read and trust the Guardian a…

I used to read and trust the Guardian a long time ago. Don’t know what happened over the years, but it has gotten progressively worse and has now blatantly turned into a very leftist biased rag. I no longer recognise it, my blood regularly reaches boiling points reading some of the truly appalling, biased, hateful and dishonest articles it now publishes. Awful.

27 avril 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Do not subscribe! Impossible to cancel.

Impossible to cancel subscription- insists I must send an email from a non-existent email address (yet they didn’t care about this when deducting monthly payments). I have now contacted my bank and if they won’t honour my request to cancel the subscription I will just have to close my bank account on principle and change banks!

Ridiculous, unhelpful customer service.

DO NOT SUBSCRIBE.

27 avril 2024
Avis spontané
Noté 3 sur 5 étoiles

I checked 3 star

I checked 3 star, because I just read an article about children being shot in Gaza. The article “implies” the children were shot by Israeli snipers with .50 caliber ammunition.
Be it known, .50 ammo is used by the enemies of Israel as well. So, just because it was .50 cal. doesn’t mean it was fired by Israel. Okay!

14 avril 2024
Avis spontané

Cette entreprise vous appartient ?

Revendiquez votre profil pour accéder aux outils gratuits de Trustpilot et renforcer vos relations clients.

Créez un compte gratuit

L’expérience Trustpilot

Tout le monde peut écrire un avis Trustpilot. Les auteurs d'avis peuvent les modifier ou les supprimer à tout moment et les avis sont affichés tant que les comptes utilisateurs respectifs sont actifs.

Nous avons des personnes dédiées et des technologies intelligentes pour nous aider à protéger notre plateforme. Découvrez comment nous combattons les faux avis.

En savoir plus sur le parcours des avis sur Trustpilot.

Voici 8 conseils pour écrire des avis de qualité.

La vérification permet de s'assurer que des personnes réelles écrivent les avis que vous lisez sur Trustpilot.

Offrir des incitatifs en échange d'avis ou demander des avis de manière sélective peut fausser le TrustScore, ce qui va à l'encontre de nos conditions d'utilisation.

En savoir plus