Secure Code Warrior Avis 3

I have been forced to do this course and it's awful. It essentially says "Code should be secure, now do a test". It doesn't actually train you or walk you through scenarios. It gives a verbose synopsis of a particular type of security flaw and then says read this documentation, which points to the OWASP site. At that point it nose dives you into completely bizarre scenarios, smacks you with an incredibly long list of multiple choice answers, laughs at you when you fail and only then puts some sort of explanation as to why your choice was incorrect. You're supposed to teach the lesson first and then test on it. Even the explanations for the answers are often just "yeah, this is insecure". It feels like this was written by somebody with a complete lack of understanding around education. I am suffering my way through this thing and would in no way recommend this as adequate training.

This should be some sort of security training however doesn't seem to be the case
In my company is mandatory to take this survey. Every time i need to submit bugs back to them.
For most of the assessments you are given a piece of code, you try to match the requirements with the code horribly written code after you identify the problem you are presented with 4 variants of horrible code that I wont ever put in my code base but they kind of solve the problem however they are introducing others

What the hell is the point of a pseudocode option that requires syntax specificity.

Steer clear unless you want to infuriate developers by forcing them to learn syntax rather than concepts