Part/5 I was totally appalled when these two…
I was totally appalled when these two the daughter and her husband came to the homeowner to prepare my removal in one or the other way. Dramatic and symbolic moments to demonstrate their unity against me, and to reveal that they’ve been misleading me from the first moment – the first meeting with the daughter in her posh flat in High St Kensington. As my mother caustically said, I’ve excellent skills towards family therapy to heal the broken and implacable relationship between the ‘angel’ wife and ‘bull-headed’ husband at my own traumatic cost. Unarguably, I’ve been scammed during the utter stay in the household due to the daughter’s undelightful character and irresponsible management towards the derelict home-share. The daughter has been liable but smartly obviated the responsibility for the term, which belongs to the remaining part of the homeowner’s lifetime and is not ‘investing’ in order to claim the inheritance in a normal, unmanipulated and genuine manner without dishonesty as she is the daughter by the way. I felt that an agreement took place between the married couple, and they want to secure the inheritance and partially cash out the homeowner somewhat before some processes may deem that their financial agenda overlaps with some illegal and prosecuted approach in terms of dealing with the elderly generation in the inheritance perspective. I observed the power shift of financial control and authority over the homeowner’s budget from the homeowner's to the daughter’s favour, whereas the homeowner was still a formally independent person.
The husband was portrayed as the antagonist in the daughter’s life, he was surprisingly gathering and sorting out all paperwork, and financial documents in the house after the homeowner passed away. The homeowner had short term after my removal as I was the last gatekeeper to protect his independence in decision-making against the daughter, and this was the reason that the daughter had to abolish me. Deliberate negligence took place after my leave and was contacted by the local hospital within 3 weeks in Chelsea that the new 'amazing' people seem to be irresponsible around the homeowner, and I was the last contact on the hospital list, unfortunately, I couldn’t interfere and believed that the hospital will report the negligence to pertinent people if the homeowner is unsafe.
I was informed that the homeowner swiftly faced degradation physically as well as intellectually which secured the daughter’s total containment over sea-changing events in the household without the alternative option of choice. The daughter aimed to do this earlier but my commitment and transparency minimised her effort and attempt to achieve her goal. I frustrated her various times to delay the effect of her unethical tries and manipulations. When she had to deal with the homeowner in contradictory times where opinions failed to match, I was standing behind or next to the homeowner most of the time, and the daughter understood that I don’t assist her to undermine the homeowner for her personal interest. That was the moment and the anti-corruption culture that the daughter loathes. The new people were loyal to the daughter’s authority and interest rather than the homeowner after my removal. A few loyal people followed the daughter’s instruction to provoke and offend me: clan mafia within the English snake culture.
I researched the topic as the experience left a devastating impact on my mental as well as physical health. I work with a reputable psychologist as well. It tends to be that I was emotionally conned and used by the daughter in order to solve her personal problems and maintain the unlawful home-share conditions to avoid proper full-time healthcare expenditure. The daughter’s attempt to destroy me was not just a financial interest but also an ideological domination that she can easily ruin other people’s condition without any compromise. The daughter warned me that if I cross her then … When the daughter turned up with the homeowner's grandson, the utter impression was that they treat the homeowner as a mature asset belongs rather than a human relative and they force you to accept their culture and practice otherwise you get trouble with seriously greedy and manipulative mental abusers. The daughter aimed to mislead me that I don’t understand the sophistication of English parental love etc. When one of the sharers was leaving permanently the merchant and the daughter instructed him/her to avoid discussion with the other sharer ‘me’ like a clan practice.
24 août 2022
Avis spontané