i Avis 

I'm calling it now. I think the i paper/inews, could be like a trojan horse for conservatives.

The idea is they're 'independent', but the problem is, they are owned by the Daily Mail.

They have this page where it shows news snippets from other newspapers/media, etc, and they are often with conservative bias, and always without any counter argument to it.

It makes sense that is a trojan horse too. Because a non-conservative wouldn't buy a conservative newspaper, so it makes sense to sneakily brainwash people (who think they've avoided a conservative biased newspaper), by pretending it's not a conservative newspaper, but still throwing in unchallenged conservative opinions into it.

I mean, how else do you get a non-conservative or centrist to believe in your conservative views? They won't buy your newspaper, so you create a newspaper that is more liberal, on the face of it, and then thrown in trojan horse articles or even just snippets of articles from conservative sources to attempt to change people's minds.

Also very suspicious after the USA elections, the inews editor was saying 'oh Kamala wasn't good enough blah blah', like every other paid for news site, (which had been told what to say).

She had way more support leading up to the election, despite the total conservative bias in the media.

Trump had completely soiled his underpants, but the reality is, Musk and Trump stole the election, and then a lot of editors were told to write 'oh it was all Kamala's fault', as if we're meant to just forget the support she had, and believe that Trump really won.

If you ever want trust back again, you need to be owned by people that are not pushing conservative agendas to protect their own bank accounts.

Subscribed online and finding it almost impossible to unsubscribe. It’s not made easy. I’ve already sent three emails and still waiting.

Badly informed articles that show such bias of the author. Seems a platform for their journalists to vent when apparently reporting " news".
Recent article on EV was from such a narrow perspective.

Took out a digital subscription with paper copy at the weekend. Realised I was 3 vouchers short for the weekend paper so phoned them....but say lines always busy so left messages, as requested, which are never responded too. Have also tried emails but same problem. Wish I'd seen these reviews before taking out the yearly sub

REALLY disappointing a feels a little bit like a con. I signed up and cancelled after a few months but they've been taking my subscrption fee every month ever seince. Ive left voicemails, Ive emailed the support email address a number of times, Ive tried to email the Editor - NO responses and the money keeps coming out of my account. DO NOT SIGN UP!!!

We have just discovered that our mum has had two subscriptions to this newspaper since 2018. Both in her name (one with an additional initial), same email address, same house address and both started the same week - clearly a mistake from an elderly lady BUT not picked up by the i-news subscription service. So she has paid an additional £1400 to i-news for her daily newspaper! The error was picked up by my brother last week and prompted a call to customer service. Not only did they say "Well it was her fault" but also when my brother angrily said we'll cancel the subscription all together, she responded with "No problem, i'll do that now" and hung up! Unbelievable. Do NOT subscribe to this newspaper.

So many pop ups

Dreadful service, subscribed for many years yet every year there is an issue in renewing, have just paid twice for new subscriptions , after leaving voice messages and e-mails have not received any reply. From my view, do not subscribe, shocking service, impossible to contact

Ad intruded,and gave no easy option to escape.Typical of modern selling methods.

I tried to renew my subscription but was unable to do this so emailed asking for help. As I got no response my husband opened a new account instead. About a week later I got an email saying they had renewed my account and had my bank details.
I can’t get through to them to sort this out. They don’t respond to emails and the phone line doesn’t let you through to anyone.
Despite opening 2 accounts I still haven’t received the coupons and have no digital access.
Shocking customer service

I signed up to have a daily I paper delivered and was supposed to get digital access as well.No papers have arrived and no link to access the digital material. I have phoned and emailed several times to cancel my subscription, but nobody answers or responds.The debit has been taken for a service I have not received.

I have had an i subscription since the early days of the i. I have been able to use the app as well as collect a paper copy from my local newsagent.
No longer, I am now told I am no longer able to view the digital version at the same time as being asked if I want to logout. All attempts at resetting digital access are blocked. The captcher is difficult to view and the sound version impossible to hear.
I have contacted i to try and solve the problems but had no response.
Considering my subscription clearly states it covers paper and digital source I feel cheated and ignored.

Despite cancelling subscription months ago they have made a charge to me through subscription for 59.99
can’t get any response from them

It might be a bit far fetched to expect a newspaper to show kindness and compassion towards humanity, but I have just read an article slamming the possibility of Charlie Mackesy's book, The Boy, The Mole, The Fox and The Horse, becoming reading material in schools!!
The idea of this book becoming a part of school curriculum is the best news I have heard in years. Don't let journalists exploit their power by ranting about their own biased opinions. Terrible use of journalism.

Just read an article about a guy who worked 3 jobs and is now a crypto millionaire, callin other people lazy.

This is a guy whos parents sacrificed almost every penny to give him a better life and yet coplains about having terrible clothes at school..

Just another privately educated person who has been handed a good education due to his parents sacrifices and now acts like that isnt the reason hes had good opportunities.

Blocked from my feed for wasting my time. What a joke of an article.

I have subscribed for a digital service, and recieved now access to articles and been charged. Email customer services and they just ignore you.

Literally just read an article about a middle class woman, complaining that she feels ‘less than’ because she can’t afford “to go to ascot, hire a gardener or take a weekend to Ibiza”.. as a working class person who’s reality is that I can almost afford food, this is so out of touch and really didn’t deserve being published. This one article has let me know exactly what kind of a publication it is. Scum. As for the writer of that article, do not ever whinge about your position in life you have it a lot better than, I’d say, 85% of the population. So for you to whine about how you can’t afford to go to ascot or hire a gardener smacks of entitlement. Boo hoo you can’t keep up with the rich joneses. Pure scum

Thinking of reporting to the ICO. Had to sign up to read an article I was interested in, but then I get bombarded by emails pressurising me to sign up to their newsletters. I am unable to unsubscribe from these as they are allegedly "important information in relation to your account". Absolute cobblers and clearly in breach of any GDPR stuff. Have emailed requesting account closure, but their support email isn't accepting mail according to my email provider.

Absolute nonsense

With writers like Emily Watkins writing about something she clearly knows nothing about, why would I pay to read this? Fortunately I managed to read her article about sewing bee before parting with my cash. So out of touch with the shows audience. Do we really need another "negative nanny" spreading her own bitter doom and gloom about an uplifting heartwarming show that so many of us have come to love. It's not the fashion show dear, it's the sewing bee. Get with the programme!

Read their biased article about Andrew Tate's interview with that sad BBC reporter - Same propaganda as BBC/VICE.
Epitome of misleading. Hopefully they'll follow VICE's exit.