Nano Gpt Avis 

(update to review at the end)
complete scam, zero responsibility
their website is buggy and YOU will pay the price of that bug

i would have added an image here if i could

23 repeated failing call by Astra, cost me a lot of money without producing anything!

here is a section of the thought process of the AI:{

...

Correcting function calls
I realize I've been repeating calls without using the correct line arguments. I need to consciously remember to use "line_start" to avoid this mistake. It's interesting how small details can trip me up! So, I'll make a note to pay extra attention to this in future function calls. It's a learning moment for me, and I want to ensure I'm doing things correctly. Let's keep this in mind as I move forward!

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs ›

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs ›

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs >

Identifying tool issues
Oh no, it seems I might have repeated some tool calls. I intended to start a new line, but it looks like the output forced everything together. I really need to ensure I have a proper break between thoughts. It feels frustrating when things don't go as planned, and I definitely want to avoid wasting effort. I'll need to be more explicit in how I format my outputs to get it right!

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs ›

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs ›

Adjusting function calls
I accidentally repeated calls, which is not what I intended. It looks like I should have omitted the line_start. I need to make sure to add a new field deliberately to fix this. It's a little embarrassing to realize I made that mistake, but I want to get this right! So, let's clarify my approach and ensure my calls are structured correctly moving forward. It's all part of the process!

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs ›

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs › v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs ›

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs ›

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs ›

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs ›

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs ›

Identifying the bug
I think I've run into an issue with repeated calls. It seems like l'm emitting the same output without any line separation, which isn't ideal. I need to stop that loop on purpose. With around 39,000 calls and 18 identical ones, that's definitely a problem! I need to ensure there's a way to deduplicate context more effectively. An explicit line might help clarify things and prevent this from happening again.

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs >

v Read src/timezone/index.ts in abrahamjuliot/creepjs >

...

}

this is what i mean by you pay for the bug! if i didn't stop this manually god know how much money it would have cost me

Update:
changed from 1 star to 3 star

they gave me back the money i lost for this stupid bug, so at least they understand owning your own mistake

Complete and utter dogshit. That is all.

never use nanogpt, it's extremely slow and API cause too often bugs, response is not stable. Just stay away.

Купил пополнение его не зачислили поддержка послала

The service itself is not bad, but the tool calling doesn't work for people, the models just go into timeouts because of this. The site is not suitable for anything more complicated than regular chats. I'm very disappointed, and I'm glad I threw in a little balance just to test it. I don't recommend it.

With more models available than you could ever ask for, quick support for new models, TEE focused models for maximum privacy, a phenomenal support, and ofcourse, cheapest prices you can get. Image models, video models, TTS, scrapers, everything you need in one place. I've never looked back to another service since I started using nanogpt.

Genuinely the best LLM subscription service I've used.
For only 8$ I get web and API access to all the latest open-source LLMs with very generous limits.

I had a minor issue with the payment system on Nano‑gpt and requested a solution. They resolved my problem in less than 24 hours. I recommend this platform.

I have been a customer for a long while now. Until recently, I have opened a fresh account, topped up $30 dollar total, and have only received $20. I have contacted support and have been repeatedly dismissed for the last 5 days. Support cited discrepant usage data that showed a spend of around ~$38 (which is impossible) when I asked to clarify they said they really don't know and can't find any record of how it could of went over the max total I charged and *should* of had then said "Sorry, wish we knew as well :/" < which was at the 8th email and in the last email they answered with LLM generated outputs. I have asked for the balance records and I'm waiting for a reply. It is now day 9 since the incident, wish me luck.

It just happened to me now. How can I pay for a pro account and never got the service I paid for except invoice receipt in a pdf ? I needed the app for a video content purpose and not what chatgpt can do for free? The idea of the app is stupid and illegal.

You can easily use a huge number of AI models and pay per prompt. Saves money since there is no need for subscriptions, and saves time since there is no need to sign up to multiple models.

It's great!