SubmitLink Avis 

Good experience overall! Very recommended.

I am very satisfied with its effectiveness.

I’ve had a great experience with Submitlink. The platform is easy to use, reliable, and makes the whole process simple and efficient. Everything was handled smoothly, and the service has been professional throughout. I would definitely recommend Submitlink to anyone looking for a convenient and trustworthy solution.

SubmitLink is a great website to pitch your songs to playlists. I really enjoyed the process of matching songs to playlists.

It is a very useful website:))

Helped me massively highly recommended well worth using the service

Very affordable compared to other promotion platforms. My songs got twice the exposure for half the price.

„Még nincs sok tapasztalatom a platformmal, de már az első próbálkozásom több száz megtekintést és meghallgatást hozott a dalomnak. Egyszerűen használható, gyors, és eddig nagyon pozitív élmény.

amazing, love it, highly recommend

Most curators have very low share rates — check them carefully before spending money

I tried SubmitLink with multiple songs and curators, and after my experience I won't be spending any more money on the platform.

My biggest issue is the extremely low share rates of many individual curators. SubmitLink suggested playlists for my songs, and being new to the platform, I assumed their suggested matches were reasonable places to submit. Had I paid closer attention to how low some of those curators' actual share rates were, I never would have spent the money.

That's ultimately on me for not digging deeper before paying, but I also don't think playlists with very low acceptance/share rates should be presented as recommended matches without making that fact much more prominent. When you're paying $2–$5 for each submission and the curator gets paid for reviewing the song whether they add it or reject it, the incentives don't feel particularly favorable to the artist.

The feedback I received also made me question how useful these paid reviews really are. I submitted two tracks by the same artist to the same curator. On one track, the curator specifically praised the vocals and said the voice sounded great, but declined it because the song supposedly needed more power and energy. On the other track, the same curator praised the energy, lyrics and flow, but then criticized the vocals for sounding too computerized or robotic.

Music is subjective, obviously, and I don't expect every submission to be accepted. Rejection isn't my complaint. My problem is paying for feedback that can feel inconsistent enough that it isn't particularly useful.

What really soured me on the system was the timing. Two curators waited until the final day of the seven-day response period to review my submissions. If they had not responded within the deadline, I would have received the submission cost back as SubmitLink credit. Instead, the submissions were declined at the end of the period and the curator was still paid.

I think SubmitLink should change that incentive. Curators who respond quickly could receive the full payment, with compensation progressively decreasing the longer they wait. A curator responding on the last day shouldn't be compensated exactly the same as someone who listens and provides thoughtful feedback on the first or second day.

SubmitLink may work well for some artists, and the platform itself is easy enough to use. But based on my experience, I strongly recommend that artists ignore the fact that a playlist is "suggested" and look very carefully at each curator's individual share rate before spending anything.

For me, the combination of low share rates, inconsistent feedback and a payment structure that rewards a curator for rejecting a song even at the very end of the deadline simply isn't worth the money.

I tested it. I learned from it. I won't be using it again.

I want to thank Aaron Whittington very much for running a successful Spotify campaign for me. Five different playlists have added my piano composition *JEUX*. 5 Playlists: Music Victory, Driving in the rain, Indie, instrumental and chill playlist, Musica rilassante per un bagno caldo, Echoes of Elegance.

Worth the investment. It’s temporary but useful for boosting listeners. Good, friendly service too.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ A Great Resource for Independent Artists!

SubmitLink has been an amazing experience! As an independent artist, getting your music in front of the right people isn't always easy, but SubmitLink has helped connect my music with curators and real playlist opportunities.

I've already seen my songs receive support and placements, and every opportunity to reach a new listener means so much to me. The platform is easy to use, straightforward, and gives independent artists a genuine opportunity to be heard.

If you're an independent artist looking to expand your reach, I definitely recommend giving SubmitLink a try!

Thank you, SubmitLink, for giving independent music another place to be discovered! ❤️🎶

— AyeAye James

I don’t think it’s a scam, but there’s pretty poor odds here. You’re paying money to get on a playlist that guarantees nothing, and you’re paying for someone’s opinion ( which you get as a consolation prize). I dipped my toe in the water with this , and went no further. You could definitely burn through a lot of money here.

I appreciate all the support you've offered my brand - it doesn't go unnoticed. Just wanted to thank you for your ongoing support!

Up to this point, there has been no progress within the overall context of what was promised, regarding streams or pitches.

Our song was on popular playlists almost instantly and I appreciate all the support you've offered my band.

The service works as described - is easy and cost effective

Far too difficult to use – very, very difficult

My results are growing with each passing day, thanks to the well-executed work and the platform's quality curators.