Awful experience with this service. They will hook you in with their 1 pound offer and then renew at £99 subscription. Must have read one article but regardless won’t cancel and refund you even if t... Voir plus
Bien que nous ne vérifiions pas les affirmations individuelles, car les avis reflètent l’opinion personnelle des utilisateurs, certains avis sont accompagnés du statut « vérifié » lorsqu’il est possible de confirmer qu’une interaction avec l’entreprise a eu lieu. En savoir plus
Pour protéger l’intégrité de la plateforme, chaque avis, qu’il soit vérifié ou non, est analysé par notre logiciel automatisé 24 h/24 et 7 j/7. Il identifie et retire tout contenu qui enfreint nos conditions d'utilisation, y compris les avis qui ne se basent pas sur des expériences authentiques. Nous sommes conscients que nous ne pouvons pas tout détecter, et vous pouvez nous signaler tout élément qui aurait pu nous échapper. En savoir plus
Lisez les avis des autres
Don't go near the free for a year or £1 option subscriptions. Apple and The Independent auto renew without emailing in advance and then say they can't refund the £99 charge (because it's been process... Voir plus
Because any topic regarding crypto sells they talk about it all the time yet they are completely clueless! Anything they say is usually about 7 days too late (even years old when they spread FUD rega... Voir plus
The Independent has become a joke. Biased journalism, constant misinformation and lies and to top it off, a 2 tier comment section. You're free to spout any hate speech against Trump, but say anyt... Voir plus
À propos de l'entreprise
Informations provenant de diverses sources externes
Independent News - Breaking news, comment and features from The Independent newspaper - The Independent Newspaper
Coordonnées de contact
Aucune trace de demande d’avis
Cette entreprise n’a pas invité ses clients à l'évaluer, donc les avis ne sont peut-être pas représentatifs.
Comment cette entreprise utilise Trustpilot
Découvrez comment les avis de l’entreprise sont collectés, notés et modérés.
FAKE AND MALICIOUS JOURNALISM
FAKE AND MALICIOUS JOURNALISM
The headline: "Death of Isis leader during US raid in Syria spells trouble for Turkey"
"The leader of the Islamic State, Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi, was killed during a US raid on his home in Atmeh, northwest Syria, on Thursday. The house was reportedly located just a few hundred metres from a Turkish-controlled checkpoint and in a village that sits just a kilometre away from the Turkish border."
The newspaper blames Turkey for failing to take a military action against a terror member who resided in a different (sovereign) country.
So, according to the Independent, Turkey is responsible for such terrorism because the country borders on Syria (Iran and Iraq). The Independent seems to have forgotten that the US have military bases across the region and they are consistently expanding their presence across the globe (which I believe contributing towards the current political and economical crisis across the world.) And yet, they have often been unable to locate the whereabouts of terrorists even when they were within a walking distance from their base e.g. Mullah Omar...
What the Independent is failing to acknowledge is that the US and UK have made numberless mistakes which cost thousands of lives and created millions of displaced people and refugees. So, in this regard the USA and its allies are of course responsible to clean the mess they have caused. However, they are NOT so responsible when it comes to refugees, democracy, human rights, infrastructure of the region! Why should they be? They are rather busy exploiting the region's gas and oil reserves. The Independent says nothing about such matters and instead constantly blames a NATO ally who currently homes over 10 million displaced people and refuges from the region. One thing I agree with the Independent is that Turkey is not ruled by a good leader. So, I do hope they rid themselves of their current puppet government in the next elections and revive the foundations of democratic and secular country.
Should be banned from the press
They didn't want to warn the public...
I wrote to The Independent newspaper that I have evidence that my plastic surgery was done by a plastic surgeon who is HIV positive and comes from Poland, he infects patients in Bristol. I also informed the local authorities and the minister of health about it. The owner of this newspaper is not British and did not want to write about the case to warn the public. Newspaper was founded in 1986.
A highly trusted brand, but a very average website
I began reading the Indy on day one. It used to be an excellent newspaper, and it has always seemed to be be genuinely independent. But it struggled with the move to digital. I tried to use its website for a few years, but it was horrendously bloated with adverts to the extent that it was completely unusable, and eventually I moved to the Times, whose subscription website was infinitely more user friendly and had far more content.
I still consider the Indy a highly trusted brand, so during lockdown a paid for a one year subscription just to give it another try. It's much better these days, but there are still too many intrusive adverts and other clutter, the news content seems very limited, and the user comments sections are poorly laid out and inconsistently moderated. I want to be an Indy customer, but with great regret, I won't be renewing my subscription.
The Independent peddles left wing woke…
The Independent peddles left wing woke propaganda. The only truthful stories are in the sports pages.
It’s not independent for one
It’s not independent for one, pure dribble. It’s only good for wiping ones bottom 👌
Unwanted, noisy videos constantly pop-up and play themselves.
Unwanted, noisy videos constantly pop-up and play themselves. Fed up with them, will not use any more.
Independent…Really? No way, No how
It is difficult to see how the I is "independent". It is the most depressing newspaper on the planet. It has repeatedly supported total losers at the polls and delights in belittling any efforts made to improve the flagging spirits of the long suffering British public. Remember at the start of the pandemic they rolled out 3 "expert" professors who emphatically told us that food rationing must be implemented immediately. What a sad limp daily paper
It takes the Indepedent months to fix…
It takes the Indepedent months to fix bugs in their comments section, and now they have been broken for a couple of weeks. Do they employ anyone with any tech skills?
Useless at reporting crypto and SpaceX, very very toxic
bad at literally everything
Toxic anti British publication.
There is no better source for bile and utter nonsense. They are a toxic pseudo news feed.
News website not to be trusted
News website not to be trusted. I news report on EU vaccination is fake news. They inflate vaccination figures in the U.K. and report down every other country in the EU.
Clearly a fake news website with an agenda
Producing false headlines...
Producing false headlines saying Rittenhouse killed 3 black men. Trying to stir things up it seems. A joke of a news outlet. ZERO TRUST
Not so Independent
The independent decides to call people anti vaxxers on their headline about the boycotting of Tesco for their Christmas propaganda advert.
Well they are no better than Tesco, people who choose not to have the jab are not anti vaxxers, it’s their bodies their choice.
Have some respect and report things independently.
Live up to your name the independent 😡
Because any topic regarding crypto…
Because any topic regarding crypto sells they talk about it all the time yet they are completely clueless!
Anything they say is usually about 7 days too late (even years old when they spread FUD regarding the China ban) Crypto is volatile so +5% or -5% in the same day isn't such a big deal... Especially if the crypto is up 300% for the year? Yet they'll sensationalise it as "Huge Dump" or crypto "explodes". Totally amateur but 1 star because the paper is hopefully recyclable!
Content is alright, when you can get to it
Good columnists and features for the most part, it's not LIBRUL PROPUGANDUH unless you're one of the eight people who still thinks putting the London sewer fatberg in charge of the country was a good idea - but it's not like you're going to be able to make up your own mind because you'll have clicked away before a tenth of the adverts have loaded. Honestly, we're getting to Daily Express levels of eye-slurry here. Someone discovers a NEAT TRICK every day, it would seem.
They've got to make their money somehow, I get that, no such thing as free news - and hey, they finally opted for an off-the-shelf comment engine, rather than their own thing - but a decent engineer could spend a couple of days making this site so much better an experience. You don't need to block the UI thread this much.
out of pocket £69.99 and can't read what I paid for
Subcribed to the offer of £34.99 - a 50% discount - for a Premium Subscription, and was charged the full £69.99.
Not only have I not been refunded the £34.99, the customer service colleague S.W in deleting my old account, has cancelled my new subscription.
First I was asked to clear my computer cache, but if this didn't work [to apply the discount to my credit card payment?] she had a plan B. Plan B never transpired, the next time S.W of Customer Services emailed me was to say she couldn't find a subscription with the email provided, had I registered it under a different email.
1) They send confirmation of the purchase of the subscription to the email that the new account was registered with, but send the instructions to set up the Profile and Login details to the email associated with the OLD account.
The above took from the 4th to 9th sept, I telephoned and no reply, I have left 2-3 messages.
I submitted a new enquiry this morning 10th Sept, suggesting that S.W needs sacked, and if S.W is the customer Service Manager, her superior needs to get in contact with me. Stating again, as in the emails, Trading Standards have copies of all comms. Fortunately I paid with a credit card, so the bank has proof of the transaction even though S.W deleted the newly paid for - in full, and never discounted - subscription in The Independents records.
A great paper, and journalists, but completely and utterly let down by a dismal, shambolic, and disgraceful customer service team. Once they have your money, they just ignore you. So I'm out of pocket for 70 quid and no access to what I paid for
More or less unusable website due to…
More or less unusable website due to video ads, clickbait stories, and other garbage littering every news story page. It's counterproductive because you can only make money from Internet ads if someone stays long enough to click the link. If they abandon the page you get nowt, zero, nothing.
The absolute WORST…
‘Would report with glee a children’s toy shortage for Christmas if they could….. DIRE…..
L’expérience Trustpilot
Tout le monde peut écrire un avis Trustpilot. Les auteurs d'avis peuvent les modifier ou les supprimer à tout moment et les avis sont affichés tant que les comptes utilisateurs respectifs sont actifs.
Nous avons des personnes dédiées et des technologies intelligentes pour nous aider à protéger notre plateforme. Découvrez comment nous combattons les faux avis.
En savoir plus sur le parcours des avis sur Trustpilot.
La vérification permet de s'assurer que des personnes réelles écrivent les avis que vous lisez sur Trustpilot.
Offrir des incitatifs en échange d'avis ou demander des avis de manière sélective peut fausser le TrustScore, ce qui va à l'encontre de nos conditions d'utilisation.








