Service Quick’s undocumented damage…
Service Quick’s undocumented damage finding led to a denied TV warranty claim
Samsung assigned Service Quick to inspect our TV after a persistent dark vertical band appeared, including during the TV’s built-in Picture Test. At the October 1 visit, the technician told me an LED was failing. The service form recorded “Vertical lines” as the symptom but classified the TV as physically damaged and outside warranty coverage. Its “Diagnosis & Note(s)” field was blank, and the technician did not show me a crack, identify a damaged component, or explain the finding.
I see no cracks on the screen or elsewhere on the TV. Samsung later relayed Service Quick’s claim of “spider cracks,” but I had not been shown photographs of them when Samsung denied my warranty dispute. Service Quick subsequently texted asking for a credit card deposit to send a technician.
I dispute the physical-damage finding and have requested the photographs and an independent inspection. As of October 8, the TV remains unrepaired. A finding with this consequence should come with a clear diagnosis and evidence the customer can review. Based on my experience, I cannot recommend Service Quick.








