Misleading Documentation
The Simple Financial Advice website and Terms of Business state (my emphasis):
‘The personalised retirement plan will look in detail at your income needs in retirement. The plan will review how best to satisfy these income requirements from your personal and company pension arrangements, state pension, SAVINGS AND INVESTMENTS and any other sources of income.’
The charges are listed as:
‘Retirement Income Planning Report: £500 fixed fee.
Implementation of Retirement Income Planning Report: £3,500 fixed fee…’
I understood this to mean that I would be charged a fixed fee of £4,000 for advice on my pensions, savings and investments. I wrote to request an appointment with their pension and tax specialist (MT) as he appeared to be their most well qualified adviser. I was informed that I could not speak to him as I did not have a final salary pension but a telephone call was arranged with their managing director instead.
After I had provided brief details of my finances, I was told that there would be an additional charge of around £1,500 to provide advice on my investments.
The company website states (my emphasis):
‘Ongoing service
Please note, it is NOT mandatory that you take this service. It is entirely your choice whether you access our ongoing services…’
‘How much does this service cost?
One annual fee of £3,000.’
I was told that the insurance company used does not deal directly with consumers. As a result, I would have to pay £500 per annum (p.a.) to retain any financial products he arranged i.e. he wanted £500 each year for doing no additional work.
The Financial Service Register shows that the firm has traded under eight previous names. This seems rather strange so I asked for an explanation but he was unable to recall all the previous names or why they had been changed.
By the end of the telephone call I had lost all trust in the adviser and the company.
Later, on the same day, I received an email with an invoice for £500 to cover the initial report and a copy of their Terms of Business for me to sign and return. I disregarded this email but received a reminder five days later.
The email and Terms of Business made no mention of the additional £1,500 fee nor the compulsory ongoing charge of £500 p.a. so I requested written confirmation which I later received. Their reply states:
‘With regard to the ongoing fee you have the choice of paying the ongoing advisor fee of £3k p.a. if you feel that is appropriate or the maintenance fee of £500 p.a.’
I wrote to explain that there appeared to be a discrepancy between the charges published on their website and their actual charges. I received no reply so I emailed a reminder thirteen days later and obtained the following response:
‘… I take exception to your comment that our fees are based on individual’s wealth…’
‘…You are the first enquiry who has ever questioned our approach and therefore I would suggest that you seek advice elsewhere.’
No explanation was offered for the discrepancy in the ongoing charge. It would be helpful to others if the company website and Terms of Business were updated to show that the published fees do not include investment advice and that there is a minimum mandatory ongoing charge of £500 p.a. To ensure that the fees are completely transparent the amended Terms of Business should be made available to download from their website.
22 février 2022
Avis spontané