I’ve had a great experience with NewsGuard. Their ratings are clear, well‑explained, and backed by sources, which makes it much easier to understand why a site is considered reliable or not. I appreci... Voir plus
Bien que nous ne vérifiions pas les affirmations individuelles, car les avis reflètent l’opinion personnelle des utilisateurs, certains avis sont accompagnés du statut « vérifié » lorsqu’il est possible de confirmer qu’une interaction avec l’entreprise a eu lieu. En savoir plus
Pour protéger l’intégrité de la plateforme, chaque avis, qu’il soit vérifié ou non, est analysé par notre logiciel automatisé 24 h/24 et 7 j/7. Il identifie et retire tout contenu qui enfreint nos conditions d'utilisation, y compris les avis qui ne se basent pas sur des expériences authentiques. Nous sommes conscients que nous ne pouvons pas tout détecter, et vous pouvez nous signaler tout élément qui aurait pu nous échapper. En savoir plus
Lisez les avis des autres
Newsguard is funded by Clinton donors and big pharma, with ties to the CFR, NewsGuard seems to have a clear agenda in favor of mainstream media. L. Gordon Crovitz is on a SOROS FUNDED Journ... Voir plus
"Newsguard" is a complete misnomer. IT decides what "news" you can get and IT doesn't guard anything except ITS own bias. It has done some ludicrous "guarding" such as preventing free speech and tre... Voir plus
I'm reading NewsGuard's ratings and they don't jibe with what I know about sites and organizations. For example, the Washington Post and New York Times depicted as fair and balanced, while Prager U. 5... Voir plus
À propos de l'entreprise
Informations provenant de diverses sources externes
NewsGuard fights #misinformation with credibility ratings of news websites—written by trained journalists and displayed in your browser. https://t.co/BjIf0KFHho
Coordonnées de contact
W 52nd St 25, 10019, New York, Etats-Unis
- newsguardtech.com
Leftist influencer
I find your reporting and evaluations to be biased. Based on your relationship with Microsoft, which is influenced by Bill the Pedophile, that's all I need to know.
Biased
Totally biased - they can't distinguish between errors and false information, from controversial opinions and topics on which we are still gathering further information from, in order to quest for truth. I.e. if they can find evidence that os contradictory to what is cited then it's "wrong" but the premis of controversial topics is that it isn't simply right or wrong and that there often is contradicting data.
More like LeftNewsList
I never got this, and normally that would disqualify me from writing a review, right? Well, I'm writing this because I fear that Newsguard's business model should be considered harmful.
The ratings are essentially based on how well news outlets follow the establishment narrative.
It doesn't matter (to newsguard) when the establishment gets the story wrong- like the russia collusion hoax or the fact that the hunter biden laptop existed and was actually authentic. They want people to believe that the whole world got that stuff wrong accidentally, or incidentally or whatever the case may be. Where in fact, there's actually criticism of the establishment narrative ALL OF THE TIME- that's literally how discussion works- this is how politics has always worked. All they are doing is suppressing the truth when it counts. We all know the truth (usually) comes out eventually.
Their policies do not encourage different ideas- they could potentially allow the establishment to brainwash the majority of people long enough to get the popular vote in- then use that to censor any idea that goes against the grain under the guise of strawmen terms such as "misinformation, malinformation, disinformation" with little substantial counter-arguments. Why no counter-arguments? Well, who wants to waste time arguing with conspiracy theorists, right?
The solution to bad speech is more speech. They're getting Newsguard into libraries, public schools, government buildings, universities and they're only spending buckets of funding into more places like that. They're partnering with some of the most powerful and richest people in the world to try and get more control over people.
If you want to be sure that the news you read is tilted into the direction of the establishment, and you want to be *all accidentally wrong together* with the establishment and newsguard- this is the service for you.
Rather, if you are looking for true, good journalism, you can't even use Newsguard with ratings in reverse- that doesn't work either. So if you want true news, Newsguard is of absolutely no use to you.
Manipulation Machine
I used to think Newsguard was and honest and a awesome service for fact checking. Over and over they have claimed to tell the truth and then bent a narrative to the point where it’s super obvious the set up their system to lean to one direction and manipulate the people.
Beware of Newsguard
Beware of Newsguard. It is highly partisan to the very liberal side of things and distorts facts and events to support its political agenda. It's a very dishonest source.
This is just another deep state
This is just another deep state, woke agenda bogus 'public service' agent that serves the evil criminals who are trying to shut down our critical thinking skills and enslave us more than they already have. Bad news for them - God is with us and we, awakened and aware are their worst nightmare. Go to hell news guard.
Go home, es reicht endgültig
Wieder so ein Verein aus Übersee, der uns vorzuschreiben versucht, was wir zu denken und zu glauben haben. Wir haben schon viel zu lange nach euren bösartigen Pfeifen getanzt.. Ich habe die Korrespondenz mit Anti-Spiegel.ru gelesen - das hat mir gereicht.
Please Go Away
I can determine trustworthy information for myself, and it may often not accord with NewsGuard's biased assessments. The very nature of NewsGuards business makes it inherently untrustworthy in itself. I don't want to see ads for this officious service when I'm using Google.
Schlampig recherchiert und zweifelhafte…
Schlampig recherchiert und zweifelhafte Behauptungen ohne stichhaltige Nachweise
völlig unglaubwürdiger Verein
Narrative Meinungswächter mit…
Narrative Meinungswächter mit Doppelmoral - absolut zu verurteilen!
Unglaubwürdigkeit.
TB obviously has not read Steven Brill…
TB obviously has not read Steven Brill book ripping big pharma. Bitter Pill. He is Co-CEO of NewsGuard. You can't have it both ways TB.
Funneling money away from certain media…
Funneling money away from certain media outlets to other media. Bought and paid for by big pharma Criminal and will eventually be shut down
strumento di disinformazione che fa…
strumento di disinformazione che fa capo alla CIA
Nicht glaubwürdig
Eine sehr Unglaubwürdige Seite, deren Bewertungen leider mehr von politischer Ideologie als dem wirklichen Interesse an ehrlicher Berichterstattung getrieben sind. Das Ziel scheint Zensur bzw. die Diskreditierung ungeliebter Webseiten zu sein. Bei Kritik von Artikeln / Seitenbetreibern wird meist auf andere ideologisch geprägte Quellen verwiesen, anstatt auf wissenschaftliche peer-reviewte Veröffentlichungen. Auch die angeblichen Analysten, die die Bewertung von Medien-Quellen als glaubwürdig / Unglaubwürdig durchführen, haben meist keinerlei Fachkenntnisse in den Bereichen die sie abdecken. Eine gefährliche Seite im Sinne des Wahrheitsministeriums von George Orwell. NewsGuard würde in punkto Glaubwürdigkeit bei einer Bewertung nach den eigenen Kriterien mit Sicherheit unterirdisch abschneiden. Es ist bedenklich, dass z.B. Wikipedia NewsGuard als Quelle für für die Glaubwürdigkeit von Webseiten zitiert. Ein Artikel, der gut beleuchtet wie NewsGuard arbeitet ist z.B. zu finden , wenn man ‘Who Fact Checks the Fact Checkers? A Report on Media Censorship’ googelt (auch wenn bei dieser AIER Seite ebenfalls oft seltsame Thesen vertreten werden, dieser Artikel trifft ins Schwarze). Insgesamt ist NewsGuard ein schrecklich unehrliches und wohl gefährliches Unternehmen.
This is a propagandist organization…
This is a propagandist organization that is being paid by Microsoft, big pharma companies and the department of defense to censor anything and everything with opposing viewpoints. They label things as misinformation simply because they are paid to. Disgusting organization.
Independent media watchdog that…
Independent media watchdog that identifies misinformation. Extremist groups hate the truth!
Alles was nicht den Mainstreammedien…
Alles was nicht den Mainstreammedien nach kommt wird als Desinformation abgestempelt
NewsGuard, What a Scam Operation
NewsGuard refuses to listen or even discuss subjects that does not fit their narrative, no mattter if that information is factual. Just another arm of the government propaganda who take money from the government to support its lies. Very sad.
L’expérience Trustpilot
Tout le monde peut écrire un avis Trustpilot. Les auteurs d'avis peuvent les modifier ou les supprimer à tout moment et les avis sont affichés tant que les comptes utilisateurs respectifs sont actifs.
Les entreprises peuvent utiliser nos invitations automatiques pour collecter des avis. Ils sont accompagnés du statut « Vérifié » pour indiquer qu'il s'agit d'expériences authentiques.
En savoir plus sur les différents types d'avis.
Nous avons des personnes dédiées et des technologies intelligentes pour nous aider à protéger notre plateforme. Découvrez comment nous combattons les faux avis.
En savoir plus sur le parcours des avis sur Trustpilot.
La vérification permet de s'assurer que des personnes réelles écrivent les avis que vous lisez sur Trustpilot.
Offrir des incitatifs en échange d'avis ou demander des avis de manière sélective peut fausser le TrustScore, ce qui va à l'encontre de nos conditions d'utilisation.








