Red Rock Estate & Property Management Avis 

353
TrustScore 4.5 sur 5

4,5

Bien que nous ne vérifiions pas les affirmations individuelles, car les avis reflètent l’opinion personnelle des utilisateurs, certains avis sont accompagnés du statut « vérifié » lorsqu’il est possible de confirmer qu’une interaction avec l’entreprise a eu lieu. En savoir plus

Pour protéger l’intégrité de la plateforme, chaque avis, qu’il soit vérifié ou non, est analysé par notre logiciel automatisé 24 h/24 et 7 j/7. Il identifie et retire tout contenu qui enfreint nos conditions d'utilisation, y compris les avis qui ne se basent pas sur des expériences authentiques. Nous sommes conscients que nous ne pouvons pas tout détecter, et vous pouvez nous signaler tout élément qui aurait pu nous échapper. En savoir plus

Lisez les avis des autres

Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

Absolutely shocking that some people have given 5 stars! I honestly doubt the genuineness. RRPM has been 'managers' for almost a year now. The building has not been cleaned for months now. The main e... Voir plus

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Great customer service and prompt answer to my query. Beverley Barnard was very quick and efficient in answering my query and had no issues in sign posting me to the right department.

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Excellent service by Jane Messenger & Ania Staniszewska from Red Rock Estate & Property Management, 2 day turn around from making payment for our sales management pack to receiving it. Prompt replies... Voir plus

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

We have dealt with various managing agents in different properties over the years, and Red Rock is one of the best we've known. Charlotte Luck has been our main contact at Red Rock-- she's very knowle... Voir plus

À propos de l'entreprise

  1. Société de gestion immobilière

Écrit par l'entreprise

Red Rock Estate & Property Management is a market leader offering a comprehensive estate and property management service to both the residential and commercial leasehold and freehold sector across London and the South East since 2009


Coordonnées de contact

4,5

Excellent

TrustScore 4.5 sur 5

353 avis

5 étoiles
4 étoiles
3 étoiles
2 étoiles
1 étoile

Aucun historique récent de demande d’avis

Cette entreprise n’a pas récemment invité ses clients à l'évaluer, donc les avis ne sont peut-être pas représentatifs.

A répondu à 64 % de ses avis négatifs

Répond généralement dans un délai de 24 heures

Comment cette entreprise utilise Trustpilot

Découvrez comment les avis de l’entreprise sont collectés, notés et modérés.

4,5

Tous les avis

(353)

113 avis reçus au cours des 12 derniers mois

Écrire un avis
Les entreprises sur Trustpilot n’ont pas le droit d’offrir des incitatifs ni de payer pour masquer des avis. Les avis reflètent l’opinion des utilisateurs et non celle de Trustpilot. En savoir plus

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Highly Recommended & Great Service.

We moved to Red Rock a number of years ago due to the previous management company being difficult to get hold of, numerous issues not dealt with and poor landscaping, Since using Red Rock they have a great portal, always available and find solutions to any issues raised on the Estate, Luke keeps the estate well maintained and Ania, Jane & Jill have also recently supported us with a move from the estate when selling our property and liaised with our solicitor on any queries. I would highly recomment Red Rock as an estate management company !

18 mai 2026
Avis spontané
Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Stacy Head (Red Rock)- excellent customer service

Stacy Head at Red Rock has helped me on numerous occassions with prompt emails reassuring me with issues I have. She is apologetic if things are taking long to resolve and I find her communications professional and kind.

28 avril 2026
Avis spontané
Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Excellent service

Excellent service. I found Vicki at Red Rock Estate and Property Management extremely efficient, knowledgeable and helpful. Vicki has been prompt to answer any queries that were raised and she proved to be a great asset whilst we were working on a project in one of the blocks she manages.

23 avril 2026
Avis spontané
Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Always very efficient to deal with!

RR is always very efficient to deal with across all enquiries, whether that's invoicing or important communication regarding the property. The process is super straightforward! :)

I recently had a very positive interaction with Megan, who helped me stay on top of a due invoice through just a couple of quick emails - which is another example of how smooth the property management is 👏

9 février 2026
Avis spontané
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles

1 star is too generous – a managing agent that fails to manage

27th April 2026 - To 28/07/26 - despite repeated requests, full bank statements for the period of Red Rock’s management have still not been provided, and there remains no clear visibility of funds held on behalf of the management company.

Red Rock’s senior management has engaged directly in responding to this review and related correspondence.

In my experience, these interactions have been challenging and, at times, have felt disproportionate in tone and approach.
As a non-resident managing agent, there appears to be a lack of understanding of the impact this has had on those living within the development.

I wouldn't have engaged with them as a Managing Agent if I'd known then what I know now.

I have been dealing with Red Rock Estate & Property Management Ltd since November 2023 in my capacity as a director of a resident management company.

My experience has been characterised by ongoing difficulties in obtaining clear, complete, and evidenced information in relation to both operational and financial matters.

Repeated requests for:
• service charge accounts and supporting records
• contractor information and documentation
• clarity on works instructed and the basis for those instructions
• bank statements relating to the management company’s funds

have either not been responded to in full, or responses have been partial and lacking supporting evidence.

To date, despite multiple requests, I have not been provided with a complete set of bank statements for the period of Red Rock’s management, which has prevented proper financial oversight.

In addition, late payment charges have been applied in circumstances where the basis for those charges has not been clearly evidenced or aligned with the lease provisions when queried.

In particular, issues have arisen where:
• works have been undertaken without clear Board approval;
• supporting documentation (including job sheets, invoices and specifications) has not been provided when requested; and
• there has been no clear audit trail linking costs incurred to properly authorised decisions.

Communication has also been inconsistent. Responses can be delayed, incomplete, or fail to address the specific points raised, which makes it difficult to resolve issues or progress matters effectively.

As a result, it has not been possible to obtain the level of transparency and accountability that would reasonably be expected in the management of a residential development.

Given the lack of resolution over an extended period, the matters are now being referred to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) for formal determination.

This review reflects my direct experience over time and the current position.

1 star is generous, but it is the lowest rating available. The experience has been prolonged, unnecessarily difficult, and extremely time-consuming to manage.

Update 17/04/2026 7.20pm

Further to Red Rock’s response, I would clarify that the issue is not a “difference in director views” but a lack of basic financial transparency.

To date, Red Rock has not provided:
• any full service charge accounts;
• any bank statements;
• any clear reconciliation of funds;
• any confirmed reserve position.

In addition, a significant sum of approximately £47,000 was transferred from the previous managing agent on handover. No accounting has been provided to show how those funds have been held, allocated, or applied since.

Service charge monies are held on trust for leaseholders. It is therefore reasonable to expect a clear audit trail showing:
• opening balances,
• income collected,
• expenditure, and
• current funds held.

This has not been provided despite repeated requests.

The concerns raised are therefore about accountability and transparency, not internal governance.

These matters are now being progressed through formal channels

Update 17/04/26 8.45pm

It’s incredibly odd to be discussing this publicly but here we are. This is Red Rock folks…

Red Rock’s response does not address the core issue.

The concern is not about “governance” or differing director views — it is about basic financial transparency.

To date, the following have not been provided despite repeated requests:
• any full service charge accounts;
• any bank statements;
• any clear reconciliation of funds;
• any confirmed reserve position.

In addition, approximately £48,000 was transferred from the previous managing agent on handover, and no accounting has been provided to show how those funds have been held or applied.

If full financial records are maintained, as stated, then there should be no difficulty in providing:
• opening balances,
• income and expenditure, and
• current funds held.

This has not been done.

This is why the matter is being progressed formally.

17 avril 2026
Avis spontané
Logo de Red Rock Estate & Property Management

Réponse de Red Rock Estate & Property Management

Thank you for your further update.

The position you continue to advance is not accepted. The statements now being repeated assert matters of fact which are inaccurate, materially incomplete, and inconsistent with both the documented history of this matter and the information previously addressed through correspondence.

For the avoidance of doubt, Red Rock maintains complete and auditable financial records for the development, including service charge accounts, reconciliations, banking records and supporting documentation. The repeated assertion that funds are “unaccounted for”, or that no financial information exists, is incorrect and is expressly rejected.

The accounting position, including the opening balances transferred from the previous managing agent and all subsequent transactions, forms part of the established financial record. The continued suggestion that no accounting has been provided is not supported by the underlying documentation and mischaracterises the position.

It is necessary to address the basis upon which these assertions are made.

The Company acts through its Board collectively and in accordance with its constitutional and statutory framework. No individual director has authority to unilaterally determine the Company’s position, to bind the Company, or to restrict or override the managing agent’s functions absent proper authorisation.

The position now being advanced proceeds on the basis that unilateral assertions are determinative. They are not. In the absence of proper authority, such statements do not represent the Company’s position, do not bind the Company, and carry no legal effect.

The continued presentation of those assertions as definitive is therefore a misstatement of the governance position.

As previously explained, the provision of financial and operational information must take place through properly authorised processes. Where requests are advanced outside of that framework, or where there are ongoing disputes as to authority, instruction and scope, this will necessarily affect the timing, format and formal issue of information. That is a function of governance and process, not an absence of records.

It is also incorrect to isolate financial matters from the wider context. The issues raised form part of an ongoing and well-documented dispute concerning authority, instruction, procurement and the classification of works. Presenting selected elements in isolation materially misrepresents the overall position.

In relation to the matters referenced, including recent works, the position remains unchanged. The condition identified on site was consistent with obstruction and lack of maintenance. This is supported by the physical evidence and by the position of the developer, who has confirmed that vegetation within hopper and drainage systems is indicative of maintenance rather than defect. No action taken has prejudiced any legitimate defect or warranty claim, including those under NHBC processes.

Your assertion to the contrary is unsupported by evidence.

As you have indicated, these matters are now being progressed to the First-tier Tribunal. That is the appropriate forum for determination based on full disclosure, evidence, contractual documentation and the Company’s governance position. Red Rock will respond fully through that process.

Public commentary is not a substitute for evidential scrutiny. We will not engage in further iterative or partial rebuttal in this format.

Red Rock will continue to act in accordance with its obligations and within the Company’s governance framework. The position set out above is final.

Noté 5 sur 5 étoiles

Excellent service by Jane Messenger &…

Excellent service by Jane Messenger & Ania Staniszewska from Red Rock Estate & Property Management, 2 day turn around from making payment for our sales management pack to receiving it. Prompt replies to queries, definitely helps with speeding up the sale process of our home here in Aveley Village RM15. Thank you. Regards, Robin

15 avril 2026
Avis spontané

L’expérience Trustpilot

Tout le monde peut écrire un avis Trustpilot. Les auteurs d'avis peuvent les modifier ou les supprimer à tout moment et les avis sont affichés tant que les comptes utilisateurs respectifs sont actifs.

Nous avons des personnes dédiées et des technologies intelligentes pour nous aider à protéger notre plateforme. Découvrez comment nous combattons les faux avis.

En savoir plus sur le parcours des avis sur Trustpilot.

Voici 8 conseils pour écrire des avis de qualité.

La vérification permet de s'assurer que des personnes réelles écrivent les avis que vous lisez sur Trustpilot.

Offrir des incitatifs en échange d'avis ou demander des avis de manière sélective peut fausser le TrustScore, ce qui va à l'encontre de nos conditions d'utilisation.

En savoir plus